Playing with IBooks Author

0 comments

Posted on 24th January 2012 by Shaun Wilden in #eltchat |Ibooks author

So, it’s a few days since Apple once more set the Internet abuzz with a ‘game-changing’ app launch and at last Twitter has calmed down a bit as people take stock of what iBooks Author can actually do. I can see from the hashtags I follow that there have already been a fair few blog posts on the subject but I wanted to make up my own mind before reading what others had to say.

Of course, you need a Mac and an iPad to fully ‘play’ with the author. Having both, I duly spent a fair few hours ‘messing about with it’ on Thursday evening.   With the permission of a colleague, I took her M.A. project (on #eltchat), which she published on her blog and used that to try out Author.

As a desktop publishing program (DTP) it is certainly easy to get to grips with  – a series of menus and toolbars make turning the blog work into a ‘book’ very simple.  I guess it will take a little longer to master the finer points but in a matter of minutes I had chapters, images and video all in book format. Being able to constantly look at how the final version would appear on my iPad screen as I went along was a boon. Fair play, Apple, it certainly is easy to produce professional and multimodal work.

 

 

Having completed my first book, the task of submitting to Apple for iTunes was relatively easy, though made slightly more complicated by me wanting to submit to a category that doesn’t quite fit into the others; perhaps this is a metaphor for the ELT profession as a whole.  However, a few clicks here and there and Apple seem satisfied. It took a day or so for the book to appear in iTunes, but it is there, and should you want to, you can download it. Of course, you do need an iPad to read it, though it is possible to share it with people as a PDF.

So, is this enough to make it game changing?  Well, it may be in mainstream education but I think it will be a fair while before it makes a difference in ELT.  For a start, how many of your students own an iPad? Or for that matter, how many of you / your schools own a Mac (and a Mac running Lion at that)?  I can see the main publishing companies having a look at it but I think it might be a while before their coursebooks go that way, especially with the rather strict and somewhat greedy EULA that Apple have that basically gives them all ownership of anything uploaded.

I can see it perhaps finding a place with the small publisher, and it may be the ideal platform for something such as the round project (though, again, the EULA may prove off-putting). A lot of people lost in the moment began to dream of publishing their own course material – certainly something that could happen but remember that having access to DTP doesn’t give you access to an editor or people to help you shape your work. You may find producing a coherent interactive coursebook is a lot harder than you think.

I can definitely see it being a professional way to share texts with students, grouping them together in a book keeps them tidy, for one.  As a teacher trainer I think it would be great to be able to put all my handouts from a course like CELTA into one book that a trainee could download.  Likewise, instead of simply sharing slides from talks I can make interactive books for iPadded attendees to download.  Though, since I constantly reference work on the Internet and use sites such as YouTube, I dread to think of copyright implications. Maybe I’ll just stick to collating ELTchat stuff.

However, one thing it might well change is the student project.  As with so many of the tech tools we recommend, perhaps the most immediate thing to do with iBooks Author is put it in the hands of the student. Encourage collaborative learning; let them produce their own work. Even if the end result is a PDF rather than a work in iTunes, Author opens up a world for students to work together to do professionally produced projects and the processes that the students use working together in English may well, in the end, turn out to be the real game change.

Bottoms Up, it’s a new year

1 comment

Posted on 6th January 2012 by Shaun Wilden in technology |twitter

http://www.disclose.tv/forum/happy-birthday-duck-did-you-think-we-would-forget-t26317.html

Happy New Year everyone. As I start my first conference of the year, I begin to wonder what this year’s conference circuit will hold in store and what new and exciting things I’ll learn.  One thing I hope is that I’ll see more of a ‘bottoms up’ philosophy appearing in workshops and conferences.

Let me explain, I go to a lot of conferences every year and see a lot of talks given by very dedicated, passionate and clearly experienced teachers.  Being both a teacher trainer and a bit of techie I tend to go to those sorts of sessions. Towards the end of last year I was getting a bit fed up.  Borrowing some terminology, sessions seemed to be taking a bit of a ‘top down approach’ to teaching and I started to wonder if we were beginning to lose ourselves in the assumption that everyone understood when we said things like Web 2.0  and ‘use a dogme approach’

“Top-down reading models suggest that processing of a text begins in the mind of the readers with

•           meaning-driven processes, or

•           an assumption about the meaning of a text.”

http://www.sil.org/lingualinks/literacy/ReferenceMaterials/glossaryofliteracyterms/WhatIsATopDownReadingModel.htm

Change ‘reading’ to two of the current topics du jour in EFL  – technology and dogme and you may start to get my drift.

Now before the dogmatists start to get their heckles raised, I am not about to have a go. Contrary to popular belief, I have nothing against dogme bar the unnecessary hype.  I actually think that as a teacher I put into practice many of the principles that dogmatists hold so dearly. For a while people seemed to divide into two camps, those for technology use and those for dogme. Thankfully that divide seems to be disappearing but, in my opinion, what both sides are still culpable of is a tendency to assume everyone in the world is completely comfortable with both, well that and a lot of hyping.  As a result, conference sessions can end up simply saying things like ‘this is a great website’, ‘dogme’ – taking the ‘top down approach’, assuming the audience will leave convinced and able to assimilate and blindly follow what they have just been told.

I think this is exacerbated to some extent by social media networks, quoting Andrew Keen, p.16 The Cult of the Amateur

“The Web 2.0 revolution has peddled the promise of bringing more truth to more people – more depth of information, more global perspective, more unbiased opinion from dispassionate observers. But this is all a smokescreen. What Web 2.0 revolution is really delivering is superficial observations of the world around us rather than deep analysis , shrill opinion rather than considered judgment. The information business is being transformed by the Internet into the sheer noise of a hundred million bloggers all simultaneously talking about themselves.”

Thankfully as 2011 wore on some of the voices started to move more into the bottom up approach.

“A bottom-up reading model is a reading model that

emphasizes the written or printed text

says reading is driven by a process that results in meaning (or, in other words, reading is driven by text), and

proceeds from part to whole.”

http://www.sil.org/lingualinks/literacy/ReferenceMaterials/glossaryofliteracyterms/WhatIsABottomUpReadingModel.htm

Applying this to technology use,  I hope that I’ll see sessions that give solid reasons for advocating tech use along with practical ideas that help a teacher integrate it into their teaching if they so wish.  Stop overwhelming with the amount of sites and show one or two and lots of ideas with concrete reasons for using them that way we can more people using  technology productively. Likewise with dogme, let’s have more of the how to do it rather than the ‘just do  it’ approach.  Show people how they can do it, don’t just tweet or announce in a session that dogme is the answer. It really isn’t that easy for a teacher to go against the doctrines of their school even if dogme is better than slavishly following a course book. So the more we show how, the sooner dogme will become more mainstream.

Please don’t get the wrong idea I am really not having a go about any sessions, just musing on what I’d like to see more of and on that note,

See you on the circuit and until then ‘bottoms up’